Someone asked me this and I found this interesting. I would like to know your answers.
My answer: the environment.
Without the environment animals and humans would not exist. I feel that finding the environment more important, human and animal rights are included too.
human rights- countries that value human rights are generally more evolved societies. evolved societies take better care of their environments. we do a lot of damage, tho, when we move from primitive societies to advanced societies because the type of energy available is crude and dirty.
america in the industrial revolution was a filthy, polluted place. there certainly is still pollution, but now there are regulations in place… it is a MUCH cleaner, healthier country than it was 100 years ago (and has more trees, too)
point being, america, japan, england- the ‘first world’ societies generally have better human rights AND better environments, because they have the wealth to clean up their energy sources- but if people are starving and scraping in the dirt for ANY means to live, they have bigger concerns than ‘the environment’
IM WITH YOU ON THAT
References :
human rights. humans are very smart. humans are better than animals. plus if we ruin certain parts of the environment, we will find other ways to live.
References :
human rights.
the environment is currently dying, and we’re still here, right?
References :
and i hate how people put animals ahead of humans. what sense does that make?
Well, human rights duh.
Im not a tree hugger and I am not a ‘Save the polar bears’ person either.
It may sound selfish but no one looks out for number 1 like number 1.
References :
human rights- countries that value human rights are generally more evolved societies. evolved societies take better care of their environments. we do a lot of damage, tho, when we move from primitive societies to advanced societies because the type of energy available is crude and dirty.
america in the industrial revolution was a filthy, polluted place. there certainly is still pollution, but now there are regulations in place… it is a MUCH cleaner, healthier country than it was 100 years ago (and has more trees, too)
point being, america, japan, england- the ‘first world’ societies generally have better human rights AND better environments, because they have the wealth to clean up their energy sources- but if people are starving and scraping in the dirt for ANY means to live, they have bigger concerns than ‘the environment’
References :
What sense does it make to put an animal before a human? Please, give examples. Because last time I checked, putting an animal abuser behind bars made sense.
Well, I don’t know if that is going to work for me, however definitely proved helpful for you!
Excellent post!